There's no fairness here

I am still slightly peeved that my car insurance has gone up 20% in this recent renewal period. This, for a car I only drive for weekend leisure, and have zero accidents and claims on record. Inflation sure is a bitch, isn’t it?

What is keeping me peeved is responsible drivers like me are practically subsidizing those who are not so responsible. It’s not me that insurance is worry about - it’s the other drivers on the road. California insurance minimums are too low to afford anything. Cars are so laden with technology that a simple bumper repair on a 2021 Toyota Corolla is over $10,000 (personal knowledge). Any basic fender-bender caused by me - god forbid - my insurance is out at least five-figures just to fix the other party’s car!

No wonder my premium has increased. And I thought it was suppose to decrease consistently as I get older! Lies!

The worst of the worst driving out in our roads are those uninsured and unlicensed. If one of those drivers were to hit me - I am absolutely on my own. There’s no opposing insurance to get money from. And because those who are uninsured aren’t likely to have any assets, there’s nothing for me to sue after, either. The proverbial rock cannot be made to bleed.

Again: the responsible drivers with proper insurance are paying for the subset of drivers who are not insured, or under-insured. It’s not fair, but that’s life. We got to protect our assets and cover potential risks.

It’s sad to see on the r/insurance subreddit folks complaining after accidents. It would typically involve an offending driver with no insurance, but the victim also doesn’t have collision coverage on their policy! So they had a perfectly working car, then boom, now they don’t. Their own insurance won’t pay to fix the car, and the other driver doesn’t have anything. Bad luck, absolutely. Bad planning? Heck yeah. The victims should have had collision on their policies.

Got to cover any downside risks that you cannot afford!

View fullsize

Worth it.

Cover your butt

Speaking of high auto insurance costs: part of the reason why it costs so much per month to insure my BMW M2 (aside from the fact it’s a fast BMW) is that I have way higher liability coverage limits than what is mandated by California. This great State of ours calls for only $15,000 for injury/death to one person, $30,000 for injury/death to more than one person, and $5,000 for damage to property (15/30/5 in insurance parlance). Those minimums are laughably low when considering the average selling price of new cars in America is about $48,000.

That means if you collide with a brand-new Toyota RAV-4, and you only have the California minimum coverage, high chance you will be personally on the hook for damages over those minimums. A total-loss for the RAV-4 is already above $30,000, so let’s not even add on any potential bodily injury of the opposing driver.

And yet the minimums aren’t any higher, because that means everybody’s base premiums would be higher as well. It seems California is incentivized to keep the minimums low, because more people would be able to afford auto insurance on the low end. (But driving is a privilege, not a right?) No need for low-income folks to carry high liability when there is nothing in their bank accounts for the opposing party to sue for.

Obviously, if you’re at least a medium earner with a some assets in reserves, you’d be risking a lot to not have higher coverage. I personally have 100/300/100 on the M2’s policy. On the other hand, I also carry uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. Because a driver carrying State minimums can’t possibly cover a total loss of the M2. It’s kind of perverse, actually: if you have assets, you have to pay more to cover yourself and cover for other drivers’ insufficient coverage. Fair, it is not.

But I gladly pay my high insurance premiums. My risk tolerance is super low when it comes to preserving the integrity of my bank accounts. The car can always be replaced with a check from my insurance; never ever dependent on the other party’s insurance to make me whole.

View fullsize

Numba wun.

The million dollars test

If you’re suddenly a million dollar richer (or whatever sum that would free you from your current place of employ), what would you then be doing everyday? 

That would your passion. 

If I were to be gifted a million dollars, I’d buy a car and get on the road. I’d take photographs wherever I go, and write about it on this website. Monetization will come from said writing and photography, plus perhaps posting videos on Youtube. 

That doesn’t sound like it would need a million dollars; if anything I can go do that right now. So why don’t I? What makes the additional million dollars so special if it’s financial value isn’t necessarily required to chase my passion? 

These are good questions. 

Quitting our day-job to follow our passion is a highly risky move, at least in our minds. The extra million dollars provides the safety cushion that eliminates the perceived risk. If the passion project fails, there’s the bundle of money to fall back on. 

Great outcomes come from taking great risks. What if we didn’t wait for the cash windfall and just set off anyways? Because let’s not delude ourselves: the million dollars won’t ever come, and each of us will have to contend with forsaking our passion for the comforts of a regular job. 

I grapple with that quandary almost everyday. 

Are you getting on or off?